The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com
Gregory Maxwell is a resident of Whiting and a former member of the U.S. Coast Guard. After leaving the Coast Guard, he spent more than two decades as a merchant mariner, including service as a ship’s captain.
During my six years in the U.S. Coast Guard, I had the opportunity to participate in a maritime law enforcement boarding that has stayed with me ever since. In 1988, the Coast Guard Cutter Mallow — operating out of Honolulu — intercepted the Panamanian-registered freighter Christina M, which was acting as a tender for smaller smuggling vessels and was found to be carrying millions of dollars’ worth of marijuana. Being the boarding officer in charge of planning and executing that operation gave me a clear lesson: authority alone is never enough — legitimacy depends on clarity of role, identity, and accountability.
The boarding was calm and methodical. We wore clearly marked Coast Guard uniforms, identified ourselves, and explained our authority and purpose before stepping aboard. Roles and procedures had been planned in advance, and every action was documented and reviewable. The crew understood who we were and why we were there, and we understood that our conduct was answerable up the chain of command. That mutual clarity mattered.
That clarity was not incidental — it was the foundation of legitimacy. Law enforcement authority is strongest when it is visible, intelligible, and accountable. Clear identification, clearly defined jurisdiction, documented procedures, and reviewable decisions are not bureaucratic burdens; they are safeguards. They protect civilians from arbitrary power, and they protect officers by grounding their actions in law rather than impulse.
Over time, my own view has shifted. In an ideal world, law enforcement would not be necessary. In the real world — the only one we have — it remains so. What matters, then, is not whether law enforcement exists, but how it presents itself and how it behaves. I have found myself increasingly attentive to the small but telling details: clear identification, professional appearance, calm posture, and a neutral — often courteous — demeanor. These are not cosmetic choices. They signal restraint, confidence, and respect for the public. They are how legitimacy is made visible.
When these standards are upheld, law enforcement can function as a stabilizing presence rather than a source of fear. When they are weakened or abandoned — when officers are difficult to identify, authority is unclear, procedures are opaque, or accountability is absent — legitimacy erodes quickly.
Public trust does not fail because people are unreasonable; it fails because power becomes unreadable. In those moments, even lawful actions can feel arbitrary, and even necessary enforcement can feel coercive.
Standards are not aspirational ideals; they are tests. When law enforcement departs from clear identification, transparent authority, and accountability, public trust erodes — regardless of the cause being pursued. Ends do not legitimize means. Only conduct does.
In Maine, this matters deeply. Ours is a state of small towns, long memories, and daily, face-to-face trust. Authority here is not abstract; it is personal. When law enforcement is visible, identifiable, professional, and accountable, it strengthens that trust and becomes part of the community it serves. When it is not, the damage lingers.
Standards are not an obstacle to effective law enforcement in Maine — they are the reason it works at all. If we want safety without fear and order without resentment, legitimacy must remain the rule, not the exception.
