The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com
Mary Swan of Portland is the mother of an employee at Shalom House.
Like many others in our community, I have been deeply shaken by the tragic death of Marlene McNeill, Shalom House program manager. It may hit a little harder for me because my daughter also works in the mental health field and is currently a program manager at a different Shalom House private non-medical institution (PNMI) program (group home).
As Shalom House employees, clients, Marlene’s family, and friends are still actively grieving, it has been difficult to also watch public discussion quickly shift toward criticism of the agency and the work being done in community mental health settings. Over the last several days, I have struggled watching public discussion quickly turn toward blame without much understanding of what community mental health work actually looks like day to day. Before my daughter entered this field, I did not understand it either.
What many people do not realize is that staff in PNMI programs work within strict state and federal client-rights standards, including principles established under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the U.S. Supreme Court’s Olmstead decision, which emphasize services being provided in the least restrictive and most integrated setting appropriate to a person’s needs. Organizations such as Disability Rights Maine have also strongly advocated for these protections, while oversight is provided through the Maine Department of Health and Human Services, including the Office of Behavioral Health and Division of Licensing and Certification.
As a result, all clients retain the same legal rights as any other adult, including rights related to privacy, personal property, and freedom of movement. Some group homes are actually apartments in the same building with one separate area for a staff office. Staff generally cannot search clients, confiscate belongings, or restrict community access except under limited legal or emergency circumstances. Clients also retain the right to refuse medications, and simply experiencing psychosis, paranoia, or other severe mental health symptoms is not itself enough to justify involuntary hospitalization.
Over the years, I have listened to my daughter come home emotionally exhausted after being yelled at for hours, threatened, insulted, or dealing with clients in severe crisis. I have heard about her team trying to de-escalate dangerous situations, support frightened residents, coordinate with hospitals and crisis services, and then immediately shift into helping the next client in crisis. These workers are often balancing the safety of everyone in the building while operating with very limited authority and resources.
I have also learned that even when staff are deeply concerned about someone, there are limits to what hospitals, police, mental health liaisons, and agencies can legally do. Clients are frequently discharged from emergency departments once it is known they reside in a PNMI, even when the residential staff continue to have concerns. My daughter has often expressed frustration that community providers, like the psychiatrists who prescribe medications to these clients, don’t even fully understand the realities staff are managing in these settings every day.
In a recent report, it was also mentioned that Shalom House was cited for an issue with a client not receiving medications. My other daughter is an ER nurse and from her, I know that medication errors unfortunately occur throughout healthcare and behavioral health systems everywhere. They should absolutely be taken seriously, but public findings do not always reflect the full picture, including pharmacy delays, prescribing issues, medication availability, regulations, and other contributing factors beyond a single staff action.
What I know from watching my daughter do this work is that the people at Shalom House care deeply about the clients they serve. They are working within an overwhelmed mental health system while trying to balance client rights, safety, compassion, and extraordinarily difficult decisions every single day. They are caring for some of Maine’s most severely mentally ill and vulnerable people — many of whom might otherwise cycle through hospitals, jails, homelessness, or the streets — while trying to help them build stability, dignity, and a meaningful way to exist within the community.
None of this excuses mistakes or means questions should not be asked. Accountability and transparency matter, but context and humanity matter too.
Right now, there are people across Shalom House grieving someone they cared about while still showing up to support vulnerable clients. And it’s not just Shalom House, it’s every single mental health worker, emergency department staff, and police officer that works with these clients day in and day out.
I hope our community can remember that before reducing this tragedy to a simple story about fault.
