The grooming gangs inquiry has been plunged into disarray this week before it has even started, as four survivors have quit the panel and two frontrunners for chairperson have withdrawn.
The inquiry was announced in June, but frustrations have grown over the pace of progress towards launching it, with pressure mounting on the government to appoint a chair and set out its terms of reference.
Survivors Fiona Goddard and Ellie-Ann Reynolds were first to stand down from their roles over concerns about who could head the inquiry and fears it may be “watered down” – something Sir Keir Starmer has denied, insisting that “injustice will have no place to hide”.
It is understood that both candidates shortlisted to lead the inquiry have now pulled out.
Here’s what we know about why panel members have quit and what the government has said in response.
Concerns over inquiry chairs
The first resignations came after Sky News revealed the two shortlisted chairs for the inquiry were former police chief Jim Gamble and social worker Annie Hudson.
Ms Goddard was the first to resign from the survivors’ liaison panel, expressing deep reservations about the candidates: “One has a background in police and the other, a social worker. The very two services that contributed most to the cover-up of the national mass rape and trafficking of children.
“This is a disturbing conflict of interest, and I fear the lack of trust in services from years of failings and corruption will have a negative impact in survivor engagement with this inquiry.”
Fellow survivor Ms Reynolds also took issue with the shortlisted chairs in her resignation letter, which she posted to X.
“A number of us raised concerns about conflicts of interest, but those concerns went nowhere,” she wrote.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Two other survivors who quit the panel, one who is going by the name Elizabeth and another by Jessica, also said the shortlisted chairs were the wrong choices for the role.
Ms Hudson withdrew her candidacy on Tuesday, with Mr Gamble is also understood to have pulled out of the running on Wednesday.
A Home Office spokesperson said: “We are disappointed that candidates to chair that inquiry have withdrawn. This is an extremely sensitive topic, and we have to take the time to appoint the best person suitable for the role.
During Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday, Sir Keir said his government “will find the right person to chair the inquiry”, but did not mention names.
The full statutory inquiry into how cases of child sexual exploitation have been handled across England and Wales was announced by Sir Keir after an audit by Baroness Louise Casey found children had been failed by the systems in place to protect them.
On Wednesday, Sir Keir said Baroness Casey would be working in support of the inquiry.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Claims about poor treatment of survivors
Ms Reynolds said survivors were “kept in the dark” and “treated with contempt and ignored” when they asked about Home Office meetings and decisions. She said it was made clear that “speaking openly would jeopardise our place on the panel”.
Similarly, Ms Goddard wrote: “Each survivor has valuable experience to bring to the table after years of being ignored, derided and silenced. To tell them their voices mattered, and then once again shut them out, no doubt left some survivors feeling like they did before: unheard and unimportant.
“I hope that in leaving the panel, someone else will be given the opportunity to make sure their voice is heard.”
Ms Goddard also claimed a “toxic, fearful environment” had been created for survivors on the panel, with “condescending and controlling language” used towards them.
Ms Phillips has said she “regrets” resignations from the inquiry and that it was “always sad when victims feel that they can’t take part in a process”.
She added: “I want to make it clear that there are many different victims and we have to ensure that all their voices are heard equally, whether they are part of the process or not.”
On Wednesday, Sir Keir said: “I respect the views of all the survivors, and there are different views, I accept that.”
He added that the door was open for people to return to the inquiry panel if they wished.
Fears of ‘diluted’ inquiry
The survivors say they fear the inquiry could be diluted, suggesting the Home Office could broaden its scope beyond group-based sexual abuse and push for it to have a regional focus rather than being truly national.
Ms Goddard said the survivors had “repeatedly faced suggestions from officials to expand this inquiry” and that it risked being “watered down”.
Ms Reynolds said the “final turning point” in her decision to quit the panel was the “push to widen the remit of the National Inquiry in ways that downplay the racial and religious motivations behind our abuse”.
Ms Phillips said allegations that the inquiry is being diluted or intentionally delayed were “false” and that it would “remain laser-focused on grooming gangs”.
Ms Goddard claimed this amounted to the minister calling her “a liar” and said she should apologise and resign.
During PMQs on Wednesday, Sir Keir insisted the inquiry “is not and will never be watered down” and that “its scope will not change”.
“It will examine the ethnicity and religion of the offenders, and we will find the right person to chair the inquiry,” he said.
‘They should start again’
The father of a grooming gang victim says the government “should start again” with the national inquiry.
Marlon West, whose daughter Scarlett was a victim of sexual exploitation in Manchester, told Sky News that public “faith” has been “lost”.
He described Ms Phillips in parliament this week as “unprofessional” and “defensive rather than listening to what survivors are saying.”
“I doubt she will resign but she has lost any kind of faith from the public, and more importantly with survivors and families.
He wants to see an inquiry with family members included alongside survivors on the panel.
“Not that I want to go on it, if I’m honest,” he said, “but it’s the families who are dealing with the services, not so much the survivors.
“It’s really important that they get family perspective. I think they should start again.”
Read more from Sky News:
Phillips slams ‘idiot’ councils for not seeing grooming problem
Leading candidates to chair grooming gangs inquiry revealed
Government denies ‘watered down’ approach
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood responded to the resignations saying the scope of the inquiry “will not change” and that it will leave “no hiding place” for those involved in the scandal.
In an article for The Times, she vowed the probe “will never be watered down on my watch” – and said it will focus on how “some of the most vulnerable people in this country” were abused “at the hands of predatory monsters”.
Be the first to get Breaking News
Install the Sky News app for free
The home secretary also insisted the inquiry will be “robust and rigorous” – with the power to compel witnesses, and examine the ethnicity and religion of the offenders.
Speaking to Times Radio on Wednesday, Ms Goddard said the Home Secretary’s statement was “reassuring” but reiterated that Ms Phillips should resign.
