Criminal charges will not be brought against Andrew Tate amid civil court allegations he subjected multiple women to physical or sexual violence.
The controversial influencer, 38, is facing civil court proceedings over the accusations but has been cleared of any criminal wrongdoing following a review by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).
The CPS said after “careful consideration” of the evidence provided by Hertfordshire Constabulary, it was ruled the “legal test for prosecution was not met” and no further action should be taken.
Tate’s UK legal team welcomed the news.
Solicitor Andrew Ford, of Holborn Adams, said: “Despite much external pressure, the evidence speaks for itself in this case and the Crown Prosecution Service have rightly confirmed the evidence is inadequate to provide any realistic prospect of conviction.
“We are glad that this is yet another example of a potential criminal case against Andrew Tate falling by the wayside.”
Follow our channel and never miss an update
The civil case against Tate, brought by four women, is due to start in June 2026.
Two of the women were in an intimate relationship with Tate, while the other two worked for his online webcam business at the time of the allegations between 2013 and 2015.
Read more from Sky News:
Woman raped by group of men in churchyard
At least four victims after church set on fire during mass shooting
Tate denies the allegations, with his lawyers saying in his written defence that the claims are false and that all sexual activity was consensual.
Three of the four women were the subject of an investigation by Hertfordshire Constabulary, which was closed in 2019.
Be the first to get Breaking News
Install the Sky News app for free
On Monday, a CPS spokesperson said: “We undertook a further review of a case file in relation to allegations of assault and rape between 2013 and 2015.
“Following careful consideration of the evidence provided by Hertfordshire Constabulary, we concluded that our legal test for prosecution was not met, and that no further action should be taken.
“We have informed all parties of our decision and offered to meet with the complainants to explain our reasoning in more detail.”
