The post $50 Million Telegram Crypto Scam Exposed! appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News
A multi-million-dollar OTC crypto scam on Telegram was recently exposed by Altcoin Alpha on X. The scheme involved popular tokens like SUI, NEAR, Axelar, SEI, and many others, with over $50 million reportedly stolen.
The scam went unnoticed for months and targeted big names in the crypto space, including venture capitalists, key opinion leaders (KOLs), and major crypto whales.
[𝐎𝐓𝐂 𝐒𝐂𝐀𝐌 𝐔𝐏𝐃𝐀𝐓𝐄]: 𝐒𝐎𝐔𝐑𝐂𝐄 𝟏 𝐃𝐎𝐗𝐄𝐃, 𝐒𝐂𝐑𝐄𝐄𝐍𝐒𝐇𝐎𝐓𝐒 & 𝐖𝐀𝐋𝐋𝐄𝐓 𝐑𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐀𝐋𝐄𝐃 !
Millions vanish, founder of Binance listed project accused, and lives are on the line. Time to expose wallets and screenshots.
pic.twitter.com/jTTKYfb8WW
— Altcoin Alpha (@AltcoinAlphaOnX) June 20, 2025
Gaining Trust
It all started with what looked like Tier-1 OTC deals shared in Telegram groups by VC circles and private investors. The deals promised tokens of high-profile projects like Graph, Aptos, SEI, and SWELL at discounts of up to 50% with a 4 to 5-month vesting period. The initial deals were executed perfectly to build trust. Investors started investing larger amounts, and were convinced but its smooth process and growing hype.
Further, Telegram groups saw a rise in OTC deals involving high-profile tokens and still offered deep discounts same vesting terms.
Ignored Warnings
But by 2025, there were signs of trouble. Eman Abio from the SUI team warned on X, saying clearly: “There is NO deal!” Lucian Mincu of MultiversX also issued similar alerts. But despite these public warnings, most investors didn’t listen. The money kept flowing in, even as the cracks widened.
The Collapse (June 2025)
The scam finally fell apart on June 1, when the final deal offering Fluid tokens was introduced. Soon after, token distributions from earlier deals suddenly stopped. Investors were given excuses like claims of travel issues, exchange problems, and KYC delays.
On June 19, Aza Ventures, the main VC group behind many deals, said that they had also been scammed. They revealed that their main contact, “Source 1,” had been running a Ponzi scheme, using new investor money to pay earlier investors. It got worse when Aza said their other sources, “Source 2” and “Source 3,” were also getting deals from Source 1. The entire setup collapsed fast, and the full scale of the scam was finally exposed.
Who is The Culprit?
According to Aza Ventures, “Source 1” is of Indian origin and the founder of a project listed on Binance. Aza Ventures is negotiating with Source 1 to recover funds, with a deadline set for month-end.
In a latest update, Ravindra Kumar, now identified as “Source 1,” denies all wrongdoing and says that a full statement is coming. But Aza Ventures claims he ran a Ponzi scheme and moved $24.5M through wallets now linked to Binance.
Aza says only $100K remains, and he is counting on future token launches to repay victims. As the investigation unfolds, the crypto community waits for clarity and the recovery of funds.
ZachXBT called out the lack of due diligence by victims, as to why they trusted an unknown “tier 9” fund with no reputation or mutual connections. He also pointed out that teams like Sui and MultiversX already gave early warnings.
This case serves as a stark warning of the dangers related to unregulated OTC trading on platforms like Telegram. Despite the warning signs, trust and social hype made the scam convincing.
Never Miss a Beat in the Crypto World!
Stay ahead with breaking news, expert analysis, and real-time updates on the latest trends in Bitcoin, altcoins, DeFi, NFTs, and more.
FAQs
Despite warnings, investors were swayed by initial successful deals, deep discounts, and strong social hype, leading them to overlook red flags and trust the seemingly legitimate process.
Victims can report to national cybercrime units and potentially pursue legal action under cybercrime laws, though cross-border and anonymous aspects make recovery challenging.
Yes, enhanced on-chain monitoring, coupled with off-chain data analysis and AI, could have potentially identified suspicious transaction patterns and red flags earlier.
