The following is a guest post from Rob Viglione, CEO at Horizen Labs.
If we had stopped at dial-up internet, we’d never have gotten Netflix, real-time gaming, or cloud computing. The evolution of internet infrastructure paved the way for mass adoption. In the same way, Layer-3s are an inevitable evolution of blockchain infrastructure—removing friction, lowering costs, and making blockchain truly ready for mainstream users. Yet, critics continue to argue that they add unnecessary complexity.
This debate about the role of Layer-3s is an active one for us at Horizen Labs. The Horizen DAO has recently passed a vote to join the Base ecosystem, a pivotal governance decision that marks the beginning of Horizen’s transition to Base, Coinbase’s Layer 2 network, as an appchain specialized in privacy-preserving applications. We’re convinced by the Layer-3 thesis and believe that Layer 3s represent the next evolution in blockchain scalability.
Horizen’s move to Base isn’t just about following trends, it’s about recognizing that a more modular, interoperable blockchain stack is the key to driving real-world adoption. We’re not just theorizing; we’re building.
The History
For crypto to reach a billion users, transactions need to be fast, cheap, and seamless. Layer-3s aren’t an academic exercise—they’re a practical response to the fact that even Layer-2s aren’t cheap enough for mass adoption. Layer-3s also optimize for special features that are not currently possible on Layer-1s and Layer-2s—such as enhanced ZK capabilities.
Fundamentally, Layer-3s address a core problem: If Ethereum (Layer-1) is expensive, Layer-2s help by processing transactions off-chain and only committing final state proofs to Layer-1. Layer-3s take this further by settling on Layer-2s instead of directly on Ethereum, creating a hierarchical model that minimizes costs at each level.
Layer-3s emerged naturally as blockchain architects sought greater efficiencies. StarkWare first outlined the concept in late 2021 under the term “fractal scaling.” Vitalik Buterin explored Layer-3 designs in 2022, suggesting specialized purposes beyond simple scaling. By 2023, major Ethereum scaling teams began implementing Layer-3 frameworks. Arbitrum introduced Orbit for launching Layer-3 “Orbit chains.” Matter Labs released ZK Stack for building zk-rollups as either Layer-2s or Layer-3s. These developments have pushed Layer-3s from theory to practice.
Not Everyone Is a Fan
Critics argue several points against Layer-3s: many believe Layer-2 solutions haven’t reached full maturity yet, and making Layer-3s is premature. Some argue Layer-3s add complexity. But great technology is about making complexity invisible to users—just like the internet did. Some view Layer-3s as redundant, arguing their goals could be achieved by optimizing Layer-2 solutions.
However, a crucial realization is emerging that makes Layer-3s even more timely: even Layer-2s, built to enable faster, cheaper transactions, might still fall short.
In some cases, a Layer-3 can abstract costs even further, ensuring near-zero gas fees. This cost abstraction is vital. Blockchain adoption requires transactions that are nearly free to the end user, and Layer-3s provide precisely this capability.
That brings a chain-abstracted future closer. Ultimately, that is better for onboarding new users, better for liquidity, and better for incentivizing the building of new dApps onchain. When users can transact without worrying about gas fees, adoption accelerates. Developers can build applications that wouldn’t be economically viable on higher-fee networks, and liquidity flows more freely when not constrained by transaction costs. The entire ecosystem benefits.
But abstraction isn’t just about cost savings; it’s also about usability and customization.
Customization and Connectivity
Layer-3s are also a natural response to the fear of ecosystem isolation. Chains don’t want to be siloed. Standalone Layer-1 blockchains face significant challenges: they must bootstrap their own security, attract users from scratch, and build an entirely new infrastructure. Many “Ethereum killers” like Cardano, Fantom, or Tezos have discovered how difficult this journey can be.
Layer-3s offer an alternative path where chains can remain connected to established ecosystems while providing better customization options: this is where their true potential lies. Application-specific chains can optimize for their unique use cases, whether it’s zero-knowledge proofs, gaming, DeFi, social networks, or enterprise applications. They can implement custom virtual machines, consensus mechanisms, or privacy features tailored to their needs, all while staying connected to the broader ecosystem, benefiting from its liquidity and security.
This blend of customization and connectivity makes these application-specific apps excel at what they do, ultimately benefiting the end users.
A Pathway to Abstraction
People may claim that Layer-3s make web3 too complicated, but there’s a good chance that it could solve its own problem. The complexity will be invisible to end users if implemented correctly.
Modern dApps can abstract away the underlying layers through smart wallet designs and intuitive interfaces. Users needn’t know which layer they’re transacting on any more than internet users need to understand TCP/IP protocols. They simply experience faster, cheaper transactions, and better products.
This natural evolution in blockchain architecture is a positive step. Layer-3s balance sovereignty with interoperability. They maximize cost efficiency without sacrificing security. They enable specialized optimization while maintaining ecosystem connections. These aren’t just nice-to-have features. They’re essential for blockchains to achieve mainstream adoption.
The internet didn’t take off because users understood packet-switching or HTTP protocols. It took off because it just worked. Layer-3s bring us closer to a blockchain world that ‘just works’—seamless, fast, and cost-effective. And that’s how crypto wins.
The post Layer-3s are a necessary innovation in crypto appeared first on CryptoSlate.
