Police Scotland officers may have acted as “super-spreaders” during the pandemic as expert advice was “ignored” by the Scottish government and the force’s ex-chief constable, an inquiry heard.
Calum Steele, ex-general secretary of the Scottish Police Federation (SPF), former chairman David Hamilton, and vice chairman Brian Jones gave evidence at the Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry on Monday.
A Scottish government decision not to prioritise frontline police during the vaccine rollout was branded “perverse”, with one officer attending 75 callouts to different households in a single weekend, the inquiry heard.
Allegations that ex-chief constable Sir Iain Livingstone rejected calls for frontline officers to be given spare vaccines, refused to issue reusable rubber masks used by officers in Northern Ireland due to appearance, and refused an alternative to roadside breath testing despite concerns about COVID transmission were also aired at the inquiry.
Giving evidence, union leaders said ex-justice secretary Humza Yousaf branded the SPF a “disgrace”, recalled they were a “pain in the backside”, and the conflict “became personal”, while evidence from a panel of experts commissioned by the SPF was met with “suspicion” and “ignored” by the government.
Mr Steele said Police Scotland “substantially absolved itself of health and safety responsibility” regarding adequacy of personal protective equipment (PPE), despite an agreement before lockdown that FFP3 masks would be issued.
He said the force “refused” to log the rate of usage, and the risks were “exacerbated” by using the same mask throughout a shift.
Prince William reveals he skipped Paris Olympics due to Kate fears
Pharmacist who took his own life after COVID jab complications was denied compensation
UK public ‘failed’ by governments which prepared for ‘wrong pandemic’ ahead of COVID-19, inquiry finds
Mr Steele said: “The issue of FFP3 masks is probably the best example of the police service knowing it has a health and safety obligation and then ignoring it.
“We were largely dealing with people who were not complying with restrictions, people sceptical of the pandemic and therefore at greater risk.
“If a police officer attended an address that required them to wear an FFP3 mask, a risk assessment said it should be discarded. But the police service was not counting the masks that were being burned through.”
He claimed officers were reusing the mask at other addresses, and that “making physical contact with the mask with their fingertips, the risk was exacerbated”.
Mr Steele said: “One of my colleagues went to 75 different households in one weekend. We were worried about acting as super-spreaders and have evidence that happened.”
Read more from Sky News:
CIA believes lab leak most likely caused outbreak
New virus found that could infect humans in same way as COVID
Follow our channel and never miss an update.
Mr Jones claimed there were other items “that would have saved money”.
He said: “The Police Service of Northern Ireland bought a rubber mask which can be cleaned. That was thought to be militaristic. That was the decision of the chief constable at the time.”
The SPF also called for roadside breath tests to be replaced amid transmission concerns, but the response from the police service was said to be “totally dismissive”.
Mr Hamilton said: “It showed the force in a quite ugly way. We always accepted we had a job to do but we could minimise the risks.”
Be the first to get Breaking News
Install the Sky News app for free
Mr Hamilton further said it was “wholly inappropriate” frontline officers were not given priority during the vaccine rollout, as he alleged Sir Iain refused to allow officers to use spare jabs, citing “it’s bad optics”.
Mr Hamilton said: “Frontline officers tended to be the youngest and the last to get it. I would have given my vaccine to someone in their 20s.
“Those most at risk were last to get it. It was a Scottish government choice not to vaccinate police officers they accepted were high risk.”
Mr Steele added: “That remains one of the most perverse decisions that really reinforced that they were casually disregarded.”
The inquiry, before Lord Brodie, continues.
