The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com
Gordon L. Weil formerly wrote for the Washington Post and other newspapers, served on the U.S. Senate and EU staffs, headed Maine state agencies and was a Harpswell selectman.
Last December, I wrote a column headed, “Biden versus Trump? Not so fast.” A month earlier, I had described a scenario in which Donald Trump could face somebody other than Joe Biden.
I recall these columns not to say, “I told you so,” but to underline again how much we should be skeptical of campaign punditry and polling.
Between now and Election Day, there will be a new and short campaign with former president Trump and Sen. J. D. Vance facing Vice President Kamala Harris and her running mate. That’s all we really know.
Within seconds of Biden withdrawing and endorsing Harris, the pundits hit the media. The range of subjects on which they began speculating was breathtaking, sacrificing thoughtful analysis for the sake of speed. Notably, many comments instantly criticized Harris, going tougher on her than they had on Vance, when Trump named him.
These shoot-from-the-hip opinions will probably prove worthless and will soon be forgotten, to be replaced by new rounds of punditry. Right now, it is more useful simply to focus on the “known unknowns” about the race.
Why will Harris be the Democratic nominee?
Any challenger would have a tough time overcoming Harris’ advantage as the heir to the Biden-Harris campaign. The campaign will be short, so the Democrats opted not to spend weeks in a nomination contest ending at an open convention.
Does Biden’s withdrawal improve the Democratic Party’s chances for the presidency?
With Biden having appeared increasingly weak, voters may no longer worry about the age of both candidates. Harris is younger and more connected to middle-aged and young voters. Democrats, especially donors, seem to be enthusiastic about her. That should improve the party’s prospects, but is far from ensuring a win.
Does the focus on Trump change?
He will now be the old man of the election and that could change perceptions of him and increase attention to his oratorical confusion and false statements. Harris could exploit his weaknesses as Biden couldn’t and try to change the focus from being a referendum on Trump. She might push her own agenda, while dismissing his attacks and recalling his legal woes.
Who will the Democrats pick as Harris’ vice-presidential candidate?
They have the opportunity to avoid an elite image. Trump chose mid-American Vance, and the Democrats may be tempted to pick a male candidate from Arizona, Kentucky, Pennsylvania or North Carolina, an election victor in a GOP state who could help Harris in swing states.
Has the influence of women in the election changed?
With Harris heading the ticket, women might be even more engaged than they have been, because of the abortion issue. The battle for the suburbs could turn on the votes of women determined to show up at the polls. She may attract some supporters of Nikki Haley, the last GOP opponent to Trump’s nomination.
What about Black voters?
They were reportedly losing some enthusiasm for Biden. Harris is a graduate of Howard University, a leading historically Black university. That contrasts even with former president Barack Obama’s education at Ivy League universities. Her background could help motivate Black voters, who might swing the election.
Will there be debates and will they matter?
Both say they want to debate, but they must first agree on the media and rules. Trump may not want the CNN rules, preferring a format that allows him the chance to interrupt. Harris may try to put him on the defensive in her own style, distinct from Biden’s or Hillary Clinton’s. A debate could be the high point of the campaign and make the election into a real contest.
Is there something happening below the surface?
Voters pick the president. But who gets to the ballot box matters, and Trump’s GOP is ready to make voting access difficult. If he loses, Trump will inevitably challenge the result and is already preparing. It’s not clear if the Democrats are ready to deal, quickly and effectively, with both attempts.
Could something unexpected happen?
Yes. The June debate, the assassination attempt on Trump, and Biden’s withdrawal have had major unforeseen effects. Candidates are vulnerable in many ways, especially to their own failings. A single unexpected event could still change everything.
Will pundits promote a clear view of the election?
Unlikely. The “experts” change their views as often as they change their clothes. They engage more in speculation than in careful analysis. A single day’s news event becomes the foundation of their short-term take on long-term wisdom.
What about opinion polls?
Their problems in finding willing participants and phrasing questions are well known. In this new political situation, they are likely to be unreliable at the outset. Polls appearing just before the elections are likely to be the most valid forecasts.
Bottom line on the election?
Be skeptical. Avoid speculation. There’s a lot we don’t yet know.
